
Motorbuys | Local Jobs |
Homes |
Rental Property |
Coupons |
Garage Sales|
Classifieds | Worship | ShopNow
|
July 25, 2008, 6:15 am
|
Advertising |
Welcome to the new Chanvillager.com , the home page of the Chanhassen Villager newspaper. Let us know what you think of the changes to the site."
Got a news tip? Email us, or call us at (952) 934-5045
|
Search |
User loginAdvertisingLatest pollPolitical pollYou are not eligible to vote in this poll.Who would be a better choice as a VP runningmate? Tim Pawlenty
50% (1 vote) Hillary Clinton
50% (1 vote) Total votes: 2 Email Edition
Type in your email address and click "Subscribe" to receive our E-mail Edition in your inbox.
PollWhat do you think is the county's biggest contribution to the state? Grimm alfalfa 14% Prince Rogers Nelson 14% Minnesota Landscape Arboretum fruit breeding program 68% Other. What do you think should be on the list? 5% Total votes: 22
|
![]() Bridge collapse brings questions
August 2, 2007 - 8:52am — FAdams
According to the Star Tribune, the highway bridge that collapsed into the Mississippi River on Wednesday was rated as "structurally deficient" two years ago and possibly in need of replacement, a rating that was contained in the U.S. Department of Transportation's National Bridge Inventory database. However, this bridge was inspected annually by the state, with no serious problems reported. Should there have been more communication from the Department of Transportation and state lawmakers on this matter? Would it have mattered? Were issues involving a lack of highway funding to blame for the bridge collapse, as the Star Tribune claims? Is money that should be spent on improving U.S. infrastructure being spent on other things? Should taxes be raised? Should money be diverted from other projects? I'm not sure about you, but I think it's beyond reprehensible to make this a partisan issue, and the Pioneer Press had it right with the statement: "Soon, there will be a time and a place to renew the fight over transportation funding, and to put this tragedy into the larger perspective of whether we are taking proper care of our infrastructure. That's an important perspective. But the crack of partisan whips and the hiss of condemnation ought to wait. For the moment, there's too much we don't know."
|
Advertising |
Local media is reporting...
Back to page topLocal media is reporting that Governor Pawlenty says he was reconsidering his opposition to a gas tax increase even before the 35-W bridge collapse.
Last Friday he said he'd agree to raise the state's 20 cents-per-gallon gas tax as part of a comprehensive transportation package. That's after he had vetoed gas tax increases in 2005 and again in 2007, both times when consumers were facing record-high gasoline prices. Consumers are still paying high gas prices, but Pawlenty seems to have changed his mind.
Does anybody seriously think a higher gas tax would have prevented the bridge from collapsing? What ever happened with the "Vote Yes" campaign, the transportation amendment that dedicates all existing motor vehicle sales tax to fund roads and transit? I thought that was billed as a panacea for all our transportation ills.
Not surprisingly, there's...
Back to page topNot surprisingly, there's been a rush by some to say that we need to pay higher taxes to fund road construction.
What about "Vote Yes" in Minnesota for motor vehicle sales tax to fund roads and transit?
U.S. Rep. Jim Oberstar (D-MN) announced a three-year, $25 billion national bridge reconstruction program financed through a temporary nickel increase in the federal gas tax. This is in addition to the gas tax increase Minnesota legislators and some media outlets are hoping for.
That's right, Jim, we're not paying enough. Stick it to us. You, too, in the Minnesota legislature. Why don't you increase subsidies to the ethonol plants, too? I'm sure your plan will be great for the economy and the "little guy."
Here's what President Bush had to say about it. "Before we raise taxes, which could affect economic growth, I would strongly urge the Congress to examine how they set priorities."
Hmm. A Congress with priorities? So maybe they could spend tax revenue on infrastructure, instead of earmarks, pet projects and catering to interest groups.
The Washington Times reports that about $24 billion, or eight percent of the last $286 billion highway bill, was devoted to highway and bridge projects singled out by lawmakers.
Wow! Is that all? Don't tell me we need to raise taxes.
The balance of the money in the highway bill is distributed through grants to states, which decide how it will be spent.
Federal money accounts for about 45 percent of all infrastructure spending.
Seems to me that somebody needs to be held accountable for not spending grants to make highway improvements on making those improvements.
What do you think?
This just in... A newspaper in Arizona is reporting that an overpass under construction on the Loop 202 Red Mountain Freeway in east Mesa collapsed Thursday morning, sending more than 75 yards of roadway to the ground. Nobody was injured.
The Pioneer Press reported...
Back to page topThe Pioneer Press reported that Navy divers stayed out of the Mississippi River on Tuesday as overnight storms increased the flow of the waters at the site of the collapsed Interstate 35W bridge in Minneapolis.
Even as the search for those believed killed in the collapse continues, historians are thinking about how they should document the carnage. As though this will ever be forgotten.
In today's edition of the...
Back to page topIn today's edition of the Pioneer Press, there's a story that's sure to upset the people trying to bring down the lieutenant governor.
It reads: "a closer look at the record throws into question the idea MnDOT could have prevented the collapse by reinforcing the Minneapolis bridge, as an outside consultant recommended. The record also casts doubt on the theory that fatigue cracks made the bridge fall."
Read the whole thing at www.twincities.com.